А что обсуждают?

[Padma]

Ну всё! Плотину - прорвало! Lets fun begin!
Начиная с того, какой ганджибас курили сценаристы!
Катался!

1. The praja. I did not understand the avadhis questioning Lakshman. The avadhis and others like them in the kingdom were the reason that Sita was banished. It was this very same praja that doubted their queen.

The Sagars goofed here. Instead of showing the praja questioning Lakshman, they should have shown them feeling bad about what they did to Sita. Sagars, please pay attention to the logic.




Fully agree! Looks like the Sagar scriptwriters are smoking something illegal while writing. The Avadhis were the reason that Sita was banished, and they have the gall (according to this convoluted storyline) to blame Lakshman for this? Given Lakshman's mercurial temparament, he should have sent a few missiles their way and dispatched them to yamalok. Rama would have had to exile him, and he could have taken Urmi and gone over to Sita (yeah, yeah, I know nothing remotely like this happened, but if Sagars can screw around with the storyline, what's wrong with this one? Гы!
However, showing them feeling bad about Sita would have been illogical too. Instead, they should have (at this stage) shown them as praising Rama for not allowing what they feared would happen. And I agree with Sita11 that I'm happy that none of the royal women were shown supporting Rama's decision (this one is not a departure, given that Valmiki is silent about their reaction